Shooting King

I could give this game a 4 or 5 Star based upon the nature of the target vs. human. there is no way any shooting game lets you aim at human beings. action is loose and holding a 10 is hard, but maybe it'll get better with use. Now the main reason it's not getting a better rating from me. it is impossible to rate anything with only three minutes of gameplay! Come on developers! Code a line in there where the "ASK" is valid only when a certain level is attained, say Level 4 or 5. is that so hard?

Only 3 ⭐'s out of 5 due to the aiming difficulty. Whoever designed the game needs to eliminate the character's breathing as those of us who are experienced gun shooters know how to control our breathing to place an aimed shot whereas we have no control over the character's breathing as it's computer driven having us fighting to aim while fighting the timer to place accurately. The majority of my shots I've kept in the 9 & 10 range at every distance it was far more difficult than in real life.

this is awesome. very addicting. actually gets pretty hard. the died that you earn money is perfect. it's not super easy. but it's not insanely hard, so you actually have to save for more expensive stuff, but nothing is too cheap. my only criticism is, i think that the bullets should be a little less per pack, or more bullets per pack. also, this game does not glitch at all. other games you might go, dang, it goes, i know i didn't miss. here you just think, dang it i missed.

decent enough game, but dont waste your money buying upgrades. For what they cost, the upgrade is very minimal. you can spend 20 bucks on a gun or sight, and you will barely tell the difference. If you think saving diamonds or buying them to get a powerful fast gun will impact how much you have to adjust for aim, you're gonna be disappointed. It make no sense that a slow, weak gun will drop the same as a fast, powerful gun. It makes zero sense. thats not how it works

This is a pretty good game but there are some warts. First, I'm pretty sure many of the online opponents are actually bots, not humans. The biggest wart, though, is that whoever shoots first has to shoot first in all three sets. This is just braindead stupid. To make things more fair the first shooter should alternate. This becomes really tiresome due to the fact that I found myself bring the first shooter in nine games out of every ten. Come on devs. Do better.

It's a decent game ... Well I'm only just starting to use it but so far it's ok. I don't like that when you let go, you fire... We should be able to aim then do something else to make it fire; tap anywhere, tap a specific button etc. I can see the ease in programming to make it work the current way but its not a very good way to us it as a player. As for how technical people are getting about how "exact" the bullets are and how the whole cartridge comes out VS just the slug is rediculous... Who cares how exact it is, it's a game! It's a fairly decent game too... so far! It's very quick to load, it's not glitchy, decent graphics, it doesn't hang etc. If you're going to critique the game based on those types of differences, then why don't you make a educational email to help the programmers instead of trying to make them seem like idiots about it. I'm an avid shooter myself and I could care less about how exact the bullets look. I just want it to work without hanging, not taking 3 min to load each level and that the graphics are good/great. It could be a bit more entertaining like shooting random items at the target (like chickens, or watermelons etc) ... But maybe that's further into the game ... I don't know. But anyway... So far it's an ok game.